Understanding Scientific Evidence in Court: The Moderating Role of Gender Stereotype Threat in Verdict Decisions

With the increase of scientific evidence being used in court cases, it is important that jurors are able to understand that evidence. This also brings up the concern of stereotype threat and how that may impact jurors’ understanding and verdict. Stereotype threat is where, after a person is reminded of a stereotype of a group to which they belong, they will tend to conform to that stereotype more so than if they were not reminded of the stereotype. The results of this study found that when the scientific evidence included a higher gendered stereotype threat, women tended to have less understanding of the scientific evidence. Furthermore, the association between understanding of the science and the verdict decision was different when the scientific evidence included stereotype threat, but this was only shown for women and not men.

Read all about it here

Meyer, K., Boohar, E., Westerman, L., Hertz, M., Urineza, T., Kelchen, H.,Eagan, S., & Gervais, S. (2020, April) Understanding Scientific Evidence in Court: The Moderating Role of Gender Stereotype Threat in Verdict Decisions. Poster for the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Undergraduate Research Fair, Lincoln NE

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: